Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi (CHP)\u2019nde 38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay ile ba\u015flay\u0131p 21. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay ve nihayet 22. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay\u2019a ve \u0130stanbul \u0130l Kongresi\u2019ne uzanan s\u00fcre\u00e7, art\u0131k s\u0131radan bir parti i\u00e7i tart\u0131\u015fma de\u011fildir. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7; siyasi partiler hukuku, se\u00e7im hukuku, yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131, ceza soru\u015fturmalar\u0131, Y\u00fcksek Se\u00e7im Kurulu (YSK)\u2019nun denetim yetkisi ve siyasal me\u015fruiyetin nas\u0131l \u00fcretildi\u011fi meselesini ayn\u0131 dosyada bulu\u015fturan a\u011f\u0131r bir anayasal tart\u0131\u015fmaya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
Halihaz\u0131rda Ankara BAM 36. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nde incelenmekte oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan Ankara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olan mutlak butlan\/yokluk davas\u0131nda verilen \u201ckonusuz kalma\u201d karar\u0131, y\u00fczeysel bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda teknik bir usul karar\u0131 gibi g\u00f6r\u00fclebilir. Oysa dosya b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7inde de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, bu sonucun arkas\u0131nda YSK\u2019n\u0131n se\u00e7im s\u00fcre\u00e7lerini devam ettiren kararlar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
\u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc mahkeme, davan\u0131n konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131rken yeni il\u00e7e kongrelerini, \u0130stanbul \u0130l Kongresi\u2019ni, 21. ve 22. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultaylar\u0131, bu kurultaylarda se\u00e7ilen yeni organlar\u0131 ve se\u00e7im kurulu tasdiklerini esas alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fka bir ifadeyle, YSK\u2019n\u0131n \u201cdevam\u201d kararlar\u0131, yarg\u0131sal tart\u0131\u015fman\u0131n zeminini fiilen de\u011fi\u015ftirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Bu noktada temel k\u0131r\u0131lma \u0130stanbul 45. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin 02.09.2025 tarihli ara karar\u0131yla ya\u015fanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkeme, CHP \u0130stanbul \u0130l Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve y\u00f6netimini g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015f, ge\u00e7ici kurul atam\u0131\u015f, kurultay delegeliklerini ask\u0131ya alm\u0131\u015f, \u0130stanbul il\u00e7e kongreleri ile il kongresi s\u00fcrecini durdurmu\u015ftur. Dahas\u0131, delege iradelerinin \u00e7e\u015fitli menfaatler kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 etkilenmi\u015f olabilece\u011fi hususunda \u201cyakla\u015f\u0131k ispat\u201d \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Buna ra\u011fmen YSK, \u0130stanbul\u2019daki il\u00e7e kongreleri ve il kongresi s\u00fcrecinin durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131 \u201ctam kanunsuzluk\u201d olarak de\u011ferlendirmi\u015f ve s\u00fcrecin devam\u0131na imk\u00e2n veren bir yakla\u015f\u0131m benimsemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Burada \u00e7ok dikkatli bir ayr\u0131m yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
YSK\u2019n\u0131n \u0130stanbul il\u00e7e kongreleri ve il kongresi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u201cdurdurma tam kanunsuzluktur\u201d yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ile 21. ve 22. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultaylar hakk\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen tam kanunsuzluk iddialar\u0131 ayn\u0131 \u015fey de\u011fildir. \u0130stanbul bak\u0131m\u0131ndan tart\u0131\u015fma, mahkeme tedbirinin se\u00e7im s\u00fcrecini durdurup durduramayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Oysa 21. ve 22. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultaylar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddialar, do\u011frudan kurultaylar\u0131n kurulu\u015f \u015fartlar\u0131na, g\u00fcndemine, delege yap\u0131s\u0131na, adayl\u0131k s\u00fcre\u00e7lerine, salt \u00e7o\u011funluk hesab\u0131na ve oy kullanma yetkisine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
Hem 21.Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay hem de 22.Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay\u2019\u0131n iptali i\u00e7in \u00f6nce \u00c7ankaya 4.\u0130l\u00e7e Se\u00e7im Kurulu\u2019na; red kararlar\u0131 verilmesi \u00fczerine ise YSK\u2019ya tam kanunsuzluk ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda bulundum. Bu arada; \u00c7ankaya 4.\u0130l\u00e7e Se\u00e7im Kurulu\u2019nda itirazlar\u0131m\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren hakim ile s\u00f6z konusu Kurultaylardaki Se\u00e7im Kurulu Ba\u015fkan\u0131 olan hakimin ayn\u0131 hakim oldu\u011funu da s\u00f6zl\u00fc ifadelerden \u00f6\u011frendim.<\/p>\n
21. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay bak\u0131m\u0131ndan itiraz dilek\u00e7emde ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcm iddialar;<\/p>\n
– Parti Meclisi karar\u0131 olmadan kurultay\u0131n yerinin, g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn, saatinin ve g\u00fcndeminin belirlenmesi;<\/p>\n
– Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131n yaln\u0131zca \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131 yetkisi bulundu\u011fu halde g\u00fcndemi belirleme yetkisini kullanmas\u0131;<\/p>\n
– Kurultay\u0131n Ankara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019ndeki mutlak butlan davas\u0131n\u0131 ve olas\u0131 \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131 heyeti\/kayyum karar\u0131n\u0131 etkisizle\u015ftirme amac\u0131yla h\u0131zland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bi\u00e7imde yap\u0131lmas\u0131; – Adayl\u0131k s\u00fcrelerinin makul olmayacak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde k\u0131sa tutulmas\u0131;<\/p>\n
– Salona ve delegelere eri\u015fimin fiilen engellenmesi;<\/p>\n
– Tek adayl\u0131 genel ba\u015fkanl\u0131k se\u00e7imine zemin haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131;<\/p>\n
-Oy verme y\u00f6nteminin delege iradesini sakatlayacak bi\u00e7imde i\u015fletilmesi<\/p>\n
\u015feklindeki iddialard\u0131.<\/p>\n
Ancak as\u0131l \u00e7arp\u0131c\u0131 tablo 22. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Yine itiraz\u0131m \u00fczerine verilen \u00c7ankaya 4. \u0130l\u00e7e Se\u00e7im Kurulu karar\u0131nda, CHP\u2019nin 22. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6nce CHP T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn 43. maddesine yer verilmi\u015ftir. Oysa 43. madde \u201cola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc kongreler\u201de ili\u015fkindir; il ve il\u00e7e kongreleri bak\u0131m\u0131ndan uygulanabilir. Parti kurultay\u0131 ise ayr\u0131 bir kurumdur ve CHP T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn 48. maddesinde \u201cOla\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Bu ayr\u0131m \u015fekli de\u011fil, esasa ili\u015fkindir. Yanl\u0131\u015f normla kurultay y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi, s\u0131radan bir yorum hatas\u0131 de\u011fil, kurultay\u0131n hukuki dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sakatlayan temel bir tam kanunsuzluk nedenidir.<\/p>\n
Say\u0131sal tablo ise daha vahimdir.<\/p>\n
\u00c7ankaya 4. \u0130l\u00e7e Se\u00e7im Kurulu karar\u0131nda delege ask\u0131 listesinin 1309 delege<\/strong> olarak ask\u0131ya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, itirazlardan sonra oy kullanacak delege say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n 1127<\/strong> olarak kesinle\u015ftirildi\u011fi, CHP Genel Merkezi\u2019nin ise 662 kurultay delegesinin<\/strong> noter onayl\u0131 ba\u015fvurusuna dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n Burada kritik hesap \u015fudur:<\/p>\n Kurultay \u00fcye tamsay\u0131s\u0131 1309<\/strong> ise salt \u00e7o\u011funluk:<\/p>\n 1309 \/ 2 = 654,5<\/strong><\/p>\n Salt \u00e7o\u011funluk hesab\u0131 yaln\u0131zca basit aritmetik bir i\u015flem de\u011fildir. \u0130stanbul 45. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin tedbir karar\u0131yla tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 hale gelen delegelikler ve do\u011fal delegelik stat\u00fclerine ili\u015fkin ihtilaflar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, 662 imzan\u0131n ger\u00e7ek ve tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z salt \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu sa\u011flay\u0131p sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ayr\u0131ca incelenmeliydi.<\/p>\n CHP\u2019nin 38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay\u0131\u2019ndaki delege tam say\u0131s\u0131 667 delegedir.<\/strong> Zira \u0130stanbul 45. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin tedbir karar\u0131yla g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan \u0130stanbul kurultay delegelerinin ve do\u011fal delegelik stat\u00fclerinin d\u0131\u015far\u0131da b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde \u201csalt \u00e7o\u011funluk\u201d hesab\u0131, basit\u00e7e \u201coy kullanacak 1127 delege\u201d \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lamaz.<\/p>\n YSK ve \u0130l\u00e7e Se\u00e7im Kurulu\u2019nun esasl\u0131 bi\u00e7imde cevaplamas\u0131 gereken soru \u015fuydu:<\/p>\n Salt \u00e7o\u011funluk \u00fcye tamsay\u0131s\u0131na g\u00f6re mi<\/strong>, yoksa sonradan kesinle\u015ftirilen oy kullanacak delege say\u0131s\u0131na g\u00f6re mi<\/strong> hesaplanacakt\u0131r?<\/p>\n Salt \u00e7o\u011funluk yaln\u0131zca aritmetik bir hesap de\u011fildir. \u0130stanbul 45. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin tedbir karar\u0131yla tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 hale gelen 196 delege ile do\u011fal delegelik stat\u00fclerine ili\u015fkin ihtilaflar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, 662 imzan\u0131n t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ger\u00e7ek ve tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z salt \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu sa\u011flay\u0131p sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ayr\u0131ca incelenmeliydi.<\/p>\n CHP T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn 48\/5. maddesi \u201cola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc kurultay isteminde bulunan kurultay \u00fcyelerinin say\u0131s\u0131 \u00fcye tamsay\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n salt \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funu sa\u011fl\u0131yor ise\u201d demektedir. Burada \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct \u201coy kullanacak delege say\u0131s\u0131\u201d de\u011fil, \u201ckurultay \u00fcye tamsay\u0131s\u0131\u201dd\u0131r. Buna ra\u011fmen 662 imza \u00fczerinden g\u00fcvenoyu ve se\u00e7im maddesinin g\u00fcndeme al\u0131nmas\u0131 yeterli kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n Bu durumda \u015fu say\u0131sal \u00e7eli\u015fki do\u011fmu\u015ftur:<\/p>\n Bu rakamlar birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, 662 say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenoyu ve se\u00e7im maddelerini g\u00fcndeme koymaya yetip yetmedi\u011fi ba\u015fl\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131na kurultay\u0131n kaderini belirleyecek bir meseledir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc 662, 667 e\u015fi\u011finin alt\u0131ndad\u0131r. E\u011fer salt \u00e7o\u011funluk do\u011fru \u015fekilde hesaplan\u0131rsa, 22. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay\u2019\u0131n g\u00fcndemine hem g\u00fcvenoyu hem se\u00e7im maddesinin birlikte konulmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n \u0130\u015fte tam kanunsuzluk burada ba\u015flar.<\/p>\n \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc t\u00fcz\u00fck a\u00e7\u0131k ise ve say\u0131 hesab\u0131 yanl\u0131\u015f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa, art\u0131k ortada basit bir usul eksikli\u011fi yoktur. Kurultay\u0131n g\u00fcndemi yanl\u0131\u015f kurulmu\u015f, g\u00fcvenoyu ve se\u00e7im maddesi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bi\u00e7imde i\u015fletilmi\u015f, buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak Genel Ba\u015fkan, Parti Meclisi ve Y\u00fcksek Disiplin Kurulu se\u00e7imleri sakatlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n \u0130kinci a\u011f\u0131r sorun, noter imzalar\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n CHP Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n kamuoyuna \u201c1000\u2019in \u00fczerinde delegenin noter onayl\u0131 imzayla kurultay \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201d y\u00f6n\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131klama yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131; buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k se\u00e7im kurulu karar\u0131nda bildirilen imza say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n 662<\/strong> oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu ikisi aras\u0131nda b\u00fcy\u00fck bir fark vard\u0131r. 1000\u2019in \u00fczerinde imza iddias\u0131 ile 662 imza aras\u0131nda en az 338 ki\u015filik<\/strong> bir fark bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu fark yaln\u0131zca siyasi s\u00f6ylem fark\u0131 de\u011fildir; kurultay\u0131n \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131 dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve me\u015fruiyetini do\u011frudan etkileyen bir farkt\u0131r.<\/p>\n \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc a\u011f\u0131r sorun, imzalar\u0131n toplanma s\u00fcresidir.<\/p>\n T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 48. maddesi, kurultay \u00fcyelerinin be\u015fte birinin 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde<\/strong> noterden onayl\u0131 imzalar\u0131yla ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc kurultay \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 yapabilece\u011fini d\u00fczenlemektedir. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k itirazda, imzalar\u0131n 04.09.2025 tarihinde toplanmaya ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve 05.09.2025 tarihinde ba\u015fvurunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Yani 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre fiilen i\u015fletilmemi\u015f; 1-2 g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde noter imzalar\u0131yla kurultay \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f gibi bir tablo ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc a\u011f\u0131r sorun, g\u00fcvenoyu ve se\u00e7imlerin birlikte y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesidir.<\/p>\n 22. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay g\u00fcndeminde:<\/p>\n 5. madde olarak Genel Ba\u015fkan, Parti Meclisi ve Y\u00fcksek Disiplin Kurulu hakk\u0131nda ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 g\u00fcven oylamas\u0131,<\/p>\n 6. madde olarak ise Genel Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k, Parti Meclisi ve Y\u00fcksek Disiplin Kurulu se\u00e7imleri yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Fakat bu g\u00fcndemin kurulabilmesi i\u00e7in 48\/5\u2019teki salt \u00e7o\u011funluk \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu \u015fart tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 iken g\u00fcvenoyu ve se\u00e7im maddelerinin ayn\u0131 kurultayda i\u015fletilmesi, kurultay\u0131n sonucunu ba\u015ftan sakatlar.<\/p>\n Be\u015finci a\u011f\u0131r sorun, g\u00fcvensizlik oyu alan organlar\u0131n ak\u0131betidir.<\/p>\n \u0130tirazda belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, Kurultay Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k Kurulu g\u00fcvenoyu\/g\u00fcvensizlik oylamas\u0131n\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fctm\u00fc\u015f; Genel Ba\u015fkan, Parti Meclisi ve Y\u00fcksek Disiplin Kurulu \u00fcyeleri g\u00fcvensizlik oyu almalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen yeniden aday olabilmi\u015f ve oy kullanabilmi\u015ftir. Oysa g\u00fcvensizlikle d\u00fc\u015fen organlar\u0131n yeniden adayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve oy kullanmas\u0131, se\u00e7im hukukunda \u201cyetkisiz ki\u015finin oy kullanmas\u0131\u201d ve \u201chukuki s\u0131fat\u0131 sona ermi\u015f ki\u015finin se\u00e7im s\u00fcrecini etkilemesi\u201d anlam\u0131na gelir. Bu ise YSK i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda tam kanunsuzluk\/yokluk tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n merkezindedir.<\/p>\n Alt\u0131nc\u0131 a\u011f\u0131r sorun, \u0130stanbul delegeleridir.<\/p>\n \u0130stanbul 45. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin tedbir karar\u0131yla 196 kurultay delegesinin<\/strong> g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmektedir. Buna ra\u011fmen, bu delegelerden baz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n ve ayr\u0131ca aday olamamas\u0131 veya oy kullanmamas\u0131 gereken ki\u015filerin s\u00fcre\u00e7te etkili oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. E\u011fer oy kullanma hakk\u0131 bulunmayan ki\u015filer kurultayda oy kullanm\u0131\u015fsa, bu sadece \u201csonuca etkili usuls\u00fczl\u00fck\u201d de\u011fil, do\u011frudan do\u011fruya se\u00e7im i\u015fleminin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 hale getiren tam kanunsuzluk nedenidir.<\/p>\n Yedinci a\u011f\u0131r sorun, bilgi ve belgeye eri\u015fimin engellenmesidir.<\/p>\n Kurultay\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 olan imza listeleri, delege listeleri, salt \u00e7o\u011funluk hesab\u0131 ve karar\u0131n dayanak belgeleri talep edilmi\u015f; fakat \u00c7ankaya 4. \u0130l\u00e7e Se\u00e7im Kurulu, 25.09.2025 tarihli yaz\u0131s\u0131yla bilgi ve belge talebini kar\u015f\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tam kanunsuzluk ba\u015fvurusunda, bu durumun, tam kanunsuzluk ba\u015fvurusunu temellendirme imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmi\u015f ve \u00c7ankaya 4. \u0130l\u00e7e Se\u00e7im Kurulu\u2019nun red karar\u0131na dayanak te\u015fkil eden bilgi ve belgelerin verilmesi akabinde verece\u011fim ek dilek\u00e7eyle birlikte tam kanunsuzluk ba\u015fvurumun incelenmesi talep edilmi\u015ftir. Ancak; dilek\u00e7emin verildi\u011fi g\u00fcn, tam kanunsuzluk iddialar\u0131m ile bilgi ve belge talebime ili\u015fkin bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz bir red karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n Bir hukuk\u00e7u bu tabloya bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u015fu sorular\u0131 sormadan ge\u00e7emez:<\/p>\n YSK\u2019n\u0131n 2025\/348 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda, yukar\u0131da ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde a\u00e7\u0131klanan norm \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131, salt \u00e7o\u011funluk hesab\u0131, noter imzalar\u0131, \u0130stanbul delegeleri, g\u00fcvenoyu s\u00fcre\u00e7leri ve yetkisiz oy kullan\u0131m\u0131 iddialar\u0131 tek tek tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f; karar esasen \u2018kurultay yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u2019 mant\u0131\u011f\u0131yla sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Oysa mesele tam da budur: E\u011fer kurultay\u0131n kurulu\u015f \u015fartlar\u0131, g\u00fcndemi, salt \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu, oy kullanma yetkisi ve delege yap\u0131s\u0131 sakatsa, \u201ckurultay yap\u0131ld\u0131\u201d demek tam kanunsuzlu\u011fu ortadan kald\u0131rmaz.<\/p>\n \u0130\u015fte Ankara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin \u201ckonusuz kalma\u201d karar\u0131 da bu zeminde ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. YSK\u2019n\u0131n il\u00e7e kongreleri, il kongresi, 21. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay ve 22. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay s\u00fcre\u00e7lerini devam ettiren kararlar\u0131 sayesinde yeni bir siyasal ger\u00e7eklik olu\u015fturulmu\u015f; mahkeme de bu yeni ger\u00e7ekli\u011fi esas alarak davan\u0131n konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Bu nedenle as\u0131l tart\u0131\u015fma \u015fudur:<\/p>\n YSK burada se\u00e7im hukukunu mu uygulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r, yoksa devam eden yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcre\u00e7lerin etkisini fiilen ortadan kald\u0131ran bir me\u015fruiyet \u00fcretim mekanizmas\u0131 m\u0131 i\u015fletmi\u015ftir?<\/p>\n \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc bir tarafta:<\/p>\n Di\u011fer tarafta ise:<\/p>\n \u0130\u015fte CHP mutlak butlan davas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fc buradad\u0131r.<\/p>\n E\u011fer bir se\u00e7im s\u00fcreci a\u00e7\u0131k norm hatas\u0131yla, tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 salt \u00e7o\u011funluk hesab\u0131yla, yetkisiz oy kullan\u0131m\u0131 iddias\u0131yla, ask\u0131ya al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f delegeliklerle ve dayanak belgelerine eri\u015fim engeliyle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclm\u00fc\u015fse; buna ra\u011fmen YSK bu iddialara tek tek cevap vermeden \u201ctam kanunsuzluk yoktur\u201d diyorsa, sorun yaln\u0131zca CHP\u2019nin i\u00e7 meselesi veya yarg\u0131 erki meselesi de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n Bu, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de se\u00e7im hukukunun ve yarg\u0131sal denetimin s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 meselesidir ve bug\u00fcn sorulmas\u0131 gereken soru \u015fudur:<\/p>\n YSK, tam kanunsuzlu\u011fu ger\u00e7ekten incelemi\u015f midir?<\/p>\n Yoksa tam kanunsuzlu\u011fu g\u00f6rmezden gelen kararlar, Ankara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin \u00f6n\u00fcndeki mutlak butlan davas\u0131n\u0131 fiilen konusuz b\u0131rakacak yeni bir siyasal ger\u00e7eklik mi \u00fcretmi\u015ftir?<\/p>\n E\u011fer YSK\u2019n\u0131n devam ve tasdik kararlar\u0131 olmasayd\u0131; Ankara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin davan\u0131n \u201ckonusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201d \u015feklindeki karar\u0131 halihaz\u0131rda Ankara BAM 36. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nde incelenmeyi beklemektedir. Medyada yer alan haberlere g\u00f6re 36.Hukuk Dairesi, savc\u0131l\u0131k soru\u015fturma dosyalar\u0131n\u0131, ceza ve hukuk davalar\u0131 dosyalar\u0131n\u0131 incelemek \u00fczere istemi\u015ftir. Ancak; Ankara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin konusuzluk karar\u0131nda belirleyici olan yaln\u0131zca yeni kurultaylar\u0131n yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 de\u011fil; YSK\u2019n\u0131n \u0130stanbul \u0130l Kongresi ile 21. ve 22. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay s\u00fcre\u00e7lerini devam ettiren ve tasdik eden kararlar\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n Bu nedenle Ankara BAM 36. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin yaln\u0131zca ceza ve hukuk dosyalar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fil; YSK\u2019n\u0131n \u0130stanbul \u0130l Kongresi ile 21. ve 22. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay s\u00fcre\u00e7lerine ili\u015fkin i\u015flem dosyalar\u0131n\u0131 ve tam kanunsuzluk ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 da birlikte de\u011ferlendirmesi, maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan zorunludur.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" YSK\u2019n\u0131n \u0130stanbul il\u00e7e kongreleri ve il kongresi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u201cdurdurma tam kanunsuzluktur\u201d yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ile 21. ve 22. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultaylar hakk\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen tam kanunsuzluk iddialar\u0131 ayn\u0131 \u015fey de\u011fildir.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":285780,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[286],"tags":[289],"class_list":{"0":"post-285778","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-yazarlar","8":"tag-manset"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/285778","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=285778"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/285778\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":285781,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/285778\/revisions\/285781"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/285780"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=285778"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=285778"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=285778"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\u0130stanbul \u0130l Kongresi, 21. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay, 22. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay
\nve bunlara ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak yeni parti organlar\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmayacak; Ankara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi de \u2018konusuz kalma\u2019 sonucuna ula\u015famayacakt\u0131. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bug\u00fcn tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lan mesele yaln\u0131zca CHP\u2019nin kurultaylar\u0131 de\u011fil; YSK kararlar\u0131n\u0131n devam eden yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcre\u00e7ler \u00fczerindeki fiil\u00ee ve anayasal etkisidir.<\/p>\n