Talking about the Republican People's Party is not talking about any other political party in Turkey. This sentence has been repeated for years, often seen as a rhetoric, but there is a very concrete reality behind this rhetoric: CHP is the political organization of a founding will. For this reason, every rupture in the CHP is not just an internal party debate; it is directly related to the state tradition, political culture and sense of social direction.<\/p>\n
This is precisely why what is happening in the CHP today is not ordinary. This is not a leadership debate. This is not a debate on electoral strategy. It is something much deeper: an identity crisis.<\/strong><\/p>\n THE REALITY OF THE FOUNDING PARTY AND TODAY'S PICTURE<\/strong><\/p>\n The main characteristic of a party founded by Atat\u00fcrk is that it produces a political mind that shapes the conjuncture rather than being shaped by it. This is the historical role of the CHP. This party was not founded just to win elections; it emerged to give a direction, to build a society and to establish a state order.<\/p>\n However, the picture that emerges today shows that the distance between this founding character and contemporary politics is widening.<\/p>\n CHP is no more:<\/p>\n to a structure.<\/p>\n This transformation is not a technical change. It is a direct loss of direction.<\/p>\n ATATURK'S CHAIR: THE WEIGHT OF HISTORICAL REPRESENTATION<\/strong><\/p>\n The chairmanship of the CHP is different from the leadership of any other party in Turkey. It is not just a seat of administration. It is this seat:<\/p>\n What is expected of the bearer of this office is therefore not only managerial skills. It is the capacity to represent.<\/p>\n This is precisely at the heart of the criticism directed at \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel today:<\/p>\n Representation has weakened and management has come to the fore.<\/strong><\/p>\n So the problem is not only what is being done, but what kind of politics is being produced.<\/p>\n MYK AND PM: CADRE CHANGE OR IDENTITY TRANSFORMATION?<\/strong><\/p>\n One of the most debated topics during \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel's term was the change of personnel through the MYK and the Party Assembly. At first glance, this change was presented as a \u201crenewal\u201d. However, the criticisms raised within the party and in the public opinion show that this process has a deeper meaning.<\/p>\n The essence of this criticism is this:<\/p>\n This is not just a change of personnel, it is a change of direction.<\/strong><\/p>\n The criticism voiced within the party that \u201cright-wing cadres have moved to the administrative levels\u201d may seem harsh on the surface, but it is actually an expression of a crisis of belonging.<\/p>\n Because for a party, cadre is not just a matter of name. Cadre also means direction. Cadre also means language. Cadre also means ideological framework.<\/p>\n Therefore, the debate over the FMC and PM turns directly into the following question:<\/p>\n Is the CHP still the CHP?<\/strong><\/p>\n NEOLIBERAL POLICIES AND THE SHIFT AWAY FROM PUBLIC OWNERSHIP<\/strong><\/p>\n The historical backbone of the CHP is nationalism. This is not only an economic choice; it is also a political stance. Publicism is the foundation of the CHP's relationship with the state.<\/p>\n Today, however, there is a criticism that is increasingly voiced within the party:<\/p>\n CHP is moving towards neoliberal policies.<\/strong><\/p>\n This criticism is embodied in the following headings:<\/p>\n This is not only related to economic policy. It is directly related to the ideological aspect.<\/p>\n And this shift in direction is widening the distance between the CHP and its historical identity.<\/p>\n SERKAN \u00d6ZCAN AND SYMBOLIC DECISIONS<\/strong><\/p>\n Some decisions in politics are not technical. They are symbolic.<\/p>\n In this sense, Serkan \u00d6zcan's decision to head the delegation formed for the Bayram visits is not an ordinary assignment. This decision has led to the following question within and outside the party:<\/p>\n Who does the CHP represent and what political language does it adopt?<\/strong><\/p>\n Because in politics, people are not only individuals. They are also messages.<\/p>\n NATIONAL UNITY AND SOLIDARITY COMMITTEE: THE UNCERTAINTY OF THE STANCE<\/strong><\/p>\n The position debates within the National Unity and Solidarity Commission are part of this crisis of direction. Although this topic may seem technical, it is actually ideological.<\/p>\n The issue here is this:<\/p>\n The lack of clarity in the answers to these questions reinforces criticism that the party's stance has become blurred.<\/p>\n WHERE IS THE REAL BREAK?<\/strong><\/p>\n The picture so far shows a loss of direction. But the real break is not yet here.<\/p>\n The real break:<\/p>\n DISMISSALS, DAGGER POLITICS, THE SHADOW OF ARINCH AND THE COLLAPSE OF TRUST<\/strong><\/p>\n To understand the debate in the CHP, it is no longer enough to look at the headlines circulating on the surface. Because what appears on the surface is actually the manifestation of a deeper fracture.<\/p>\n This is the name of the break:<\/p>\n is the collapse of trust.<\/strong><\/p>\n And this collapse is most clearly visible in four areas:<\/p>\n EXPULSIONS: CONTRACTION, NOT DISCIPLINE<\/strong><\/p>\n The expulsion of thirty district heads and hundreds of party members can technically be defined as a disciplinary process. But in politics, it is not technical definitions that matter, but the outcome.<\/p>\n The result is this:<\/p>\n The CHP is unable to bear the plurality within itself.<\/strong><\/p>\n Who are these people?<\/p>\n cadres.<\/p>\n The expulsion of these cadres is not just an organizational decision. It shows the weakening of the party's relationship with its own memory.<\/p>\n The feeling that emerges at this point is clear:<\/p>\n Loyalty is not rewarded, difference is punished.<\/strong><\/p>\n ACCUMULATION OF CONTRADICTIONS: LOSS OF MEASURE<\/strong><\/p>\n On the one hand, there are those who are rumored to have been dismissed for taking a photo with G\u00fcrsel Tekin...<\/p>\n On the other hand, the weak reflex against the heavy insults against K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu and his family...<\/p>\n This picture is not a singular contradiction. It points to a deeper problem:<\/p>\n loss of measure.<\/strong><\/p>\n When the measure is lost in politics, no decision seems fair. And when the sense of justice is undermined, internal party ties dissolve rapidly.<\/p>\n THE KILI\u00c7DARO\u011eLU PROCESS: HOW DID AN ERA COME TO A CLOSE?<\/strong><\/p>\n The change of leader in the CHP cannot be read as a classical political change. Because this process is not only an election result, but also a transformation of political culture.<\/p>\n Today, there is an open expression within the party:<\/p>\n \u201c\u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel stabbed Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu in the back.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n This statement may be exaggerated. But what matters is not the truth of the statement, but its existence.<\/p>\n This statement indicates that:<\/p>\n The change of leader has produced a sense of rupture within the CHP.<\/strong><\/p>\n And the more critical question is this:<\/p>\n What has this rupture replaced?<\/p>\n There is no clear answer to this question.<\/p>\n And every vacuum without an answer breeds distrust in politics.<\/p>\n POLITICAL LANGUAGE: UNCERTAINTY, NOT TOUGHNESS<\/strong><\/p>\n The language circulating within the CHP today is remarkable:<\/p>\n This language is harsh. But harshness is not the issue.<\/p>\n The point is this:<\/p>\n This language does not generate trust.<\/strong><\/p>\n Language in politics is not only a means of communication. It is also an indicator of institutional weight. If the language disintegrates, so does the institution.<\/p>\n THE ARINCH CONTROVERSY: MORE THAN A SYMBOL<\/strong><\/p>\n And now we come to one of the most critical points of the debate:<\/p>\n The issue of B\u00fclent Ar\u0131n\u00e7.<\/strong><\/p>\n One of the historical references of the CHP is B\u00fclent Ecevit. Ecevit represents the moral and ideological boundaries of this party.<\/p>\n Today, however, the question is being asked openly within the CHP:<\/p>\n Which B\u00fclent is \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel following?<\/strong><\/p>\n This question is not a polemic. It is a question of direction.<\/p>\n Because this question poses the following:<\/p>\n This debate is directly related to the CHP's identity.<\/p>\n DISTANCING FROM ECEVI\u0307T: NOT JUST A MATTER OF A NAME<\/strong><\/p>\n Ecevit's politics:<\/p>\n was a line.<\/p>\n Today, critics say:<\/p>\n This difference is not a difference in style.<\/p>\n It is a difference of direction.<\/strong><\/p>\n INTENSITY OF ALLEGATIONS: MAIN QUESTION<\/strong><\/p>\n Today, many allegations are circulating around the CHP:<\/p>\n Each of these claims can be evaluated separately.<\/p>\n But the real issue is this:<\/p>\n Why can so many allegations circulate at the same time and so strongly?<\/strong><\/p>\n The answer is simple:<\/p>\n Trust is weakened.<\/strong><\/p>\n MANAVGAT AND IMPLICATION POLITICS<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cThe \u201d32 hours of footage\" is a dangerous threshold in politics.<\/p>\n This discourse opens up two possibilities:<\/p>\n Both possibilities are problematic.<\/p>\n Because politics:<\/p>\n THE FIVE STONE CIRCLE AND THE ISSUE OF PERCEPTION<\/strong><\/p>\n The property debates about \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel are based on the same ground.<\/p>\n The veracity of these allegations is another matter.<\/p>\n But the important thing is this:<\/p>\n Perception is formed.<\/strong><\/p>\n And politics is shaped not only by facts but also by perception.<\/p>\n NOT A CRISIS, BUT A THAW<\/strong><\/p>\n Today's situation in the CHP can be summarized in a single word:<\/p>\n This is not a crisis.<\/p>\n This is a thaw.<\/strong><\/p>\n Because:<\/p>\n Now all the pieces are united.<\/p>\n Only one question remains:<\/p>\n Where will CHP go with this picture? IT IS NOT THE PERSON WHO NEEDS TO BE SAVED, BUT THE PARTY ITSELF<\/strong><\/p>\n There is no need to redefine the picture anymore. From this point on, it is not about individual incidents.<\/p>\n The point is this:<\/p>\n The Republican People's Party is experiencing a tension between its historical identity and its current political practice.<\/strong><\/p>\n And this tension can no longer be ignored.<\/p>\n ACCUMULATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC TABLE<\/strong><\/p>\n Let us simplify the picture that emerged today:<\/p>\n Each of these topics can be discussed on its own. This is no longer a problem of singular events, but a problem of direction.<\/strong><\/p>\n FROM IDENTITY EROSION TO IDENTITY CRISIS<\/strong><\/p>\n Political parties change over time. This is natural. But this change must have a direction and a limit.<\/p>\n The change in the CHP today produces uncertainty rather than a transformation.<\/p>\n This picture is not an \u201cerosion\u201d but a further step forward:<\/p>\n An identity crisis.<\/strong><\/p>\n WHAT IT MEANS TO BE THE PARTY OF ATATURK<\/strong><\/p>\n This is where the CHP differs from other parties.<\/p>\n This party is not just a political structure.<\/p>\n This party<\/p>\n The standards for CHP are therefore different.<\/p>\n In this party:<\/p>\n These are a must.<\/p>\n RESPONSIBILITY: IMPERSONAL BUT PERSONAL<\/strong><\/p>\n At this point, a clear distinction must be made:<\/p>\n This is not just a matter of one person.<\/p>\n But this is also clear:<\/p>\n At the center of this picture is leadership.<\/strong><\/p>\n Because:<\/p>\n Therefore, the responsibility for the picture that emerges is also centered in this center.<\/p>\n This is not a personal accusation.<\/p>\n This is a natural consequence of political responsibility.<\/p>\n NO LONGER A QUESTION, BUT A MOMENT OF DECISION<\/strong><\/p>\n Today, the CHP has two paths in front of it:<\/p>\n Path one: Second way: These two paths cannot be walked at the same time.<\/p>\n THE CLEAREST TRUTH: NO POLITICS WITHOUT TRUST<\/strong><\/p>\n The basis of politics is trust.<\/p>\n If you do:<\/p>\n The real problem there is not individual incidents, but the breakdown of trust.<\/p>\n And loss of trust is the worst crisis in politics.<\/p>\n The Republican People's Party is a structure above individuals.<\/p>\n No one is bigger than the CHP.<\/p>\n But the CHP cannot represent itself with a picture that constantly generates controversy.<\/p>\n It is therefore clear what needs to be done:<\/p>\n Either these discussions should be ended in an open, transparent and non-controversial manner, Today, the clearest option for the Republican People's Party to preserve its historical weight is the following:<\/p>\n \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel must either resolve this crisis of confidence once and for all, Because it is not about one person.<\/p>\n The issue is the future of the party founded by Atat\u00fcrk.<\/strong><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" To understand the debate in the CHP, it is no longer enough to look at the headlines circulating on the surface. Because what appears on the surface is actually the manifestation of a deeper fracture.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":283997,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[286],"tags":[15,78,289,288],"class_list":{"0":"post-283995","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-yazarlar","8":"tag-chp","9":"tag-kemal-kilicdaroglu","10":"tag-manset","11":"tag-ozgur-ozel"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283995","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=283995"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283995\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":283998,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283995\/revisions\/283998"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/283997"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=283995"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=283995"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=283995"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\nAnd who is responsible for this picture?<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nThe pieces came together. Headlines overlapped. Debates accumulated.<\/p>\n\n
\nBut taken together, what emerges is clear:<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\nNormalize this picture and move on.<\/p>\n
\nRecognize this picture as a crisis and embark on a process of rebuilding.<\/p>\n\n
\nor that office should not be held in the shadow of these debates.<\/p>\n
\nor he should step down to protect the party's founding identity.<\/strong><\/p>\n