“Where is this cry for change? Who changed who? Can change really be achieved with this understanding? What kind of a picture would we be facing today if there was no change? Where the Republican People's Party stands and where it is going has become one of the most fundamental questions of society.
The rhetoric of change emerged with great hopes, but the practice seems to be far from meeting expectations. Unless the spirit of renewal, vision and unity demanded by the people is adequately reflected, it is not possible for the party to move forward with an understanding of change that remains only in rhetoric.
Today, the CHP's internal balances, management approach and strategic choices raise more questions than reassure the public. A real change is possible by listening to sincere criticism, without compromising on merit, and by putting the voice of the grassroots at the center. Otherwise, the claim of change is doomed to remain just a slogan.”
Really... When one thinks of change, one thinks of great hopes and radical transformations. For years, we have been dreaming that the change that the people desired, hoped for and waited for would lead the CHP to power and lead to the salvation of the country. However, it seems that apart from the change of the chairman of the period, we could not see any other tangible change.
“Like ”This is Muş, the road is hilly; no one is coming, what is it?", we have witnessed that the expected renewal on the road we set out to change has not come in any way.
Guest Author Mazlum Kutlu