HALKWEBAuthorsIt is the silencing of the truth, not the opposition, that destroys power

It is the silencing of the truth, not the opposition, that destroys power

Power is temporary. But the right cadre, the right mind and the right morals are permanent.

0:00 0:00

Failure in politics often starts not with wrong policies but with a wrong perception of reality. The biggest threat to those in power is not the opposition; it is not criticism at all. The real threat is the formation of an environment that cannot or is not allowed to speak the truth. Because where the truth is silenced, the reflex of governance atrophies.

Today, the main reason for the governance crises in the political establishment, and especially in local governments, is the closed cadre structures based on loyalty rather than merit. These structures do not protect the manager; on the contrary, they detach him/her from reality.

There is a strong objection to this point that is often voiced:
“Politics cannot work without loyalty. The leader must have a loyal cadre around him that he can trust.”

At first glance, this objection seems reasonable. After all, politics is a power struggle and decision-making processes cannot function without a relationship of trust.

But there is a critical distinction here that is deliberately overlooked:
Loyalty and silence are not the same thing.

Trust is built with people who can tell the truth, not with those who hide wrongdoing. An environment that only passes on information it likes does not protect the manager; it leads him or her into error. A staff that cannot tell the truth is not loyal; it is dysfunctional.

In structures dominated by loyalty-based staffing, critical reason is systematically eliminated. Technical, legal and financial warnings “incompatibility” as a problem. This prevents problems from being solved at an early stage. Crises are delayed, grow and eventually become unmanageable. Power still seems to be held, but the capacity to manage is silently eroded.

Another objection claims to be more realistic:
“Merit is a beautiful ideal, but it is not practicable in this country. Politics is also about power.”

This is precisely why merit is not an ideal but a necessity. Any structure that does not balance power makes power destructive. Merit is not an element that weakens the manager; it is an insurance that protects him/her from mistakes. Where power is not limited, the public interest becomes unsustainable.

Clean, honest and lasting politics is possible in structures that institutionalize criticism, not suppress it. Staff who can tell the truth are not the ruler's rivals, but their greatest support. Open mind, transparency and merit is not only a moral but also an administrative obligation.

It is therefore necessary to say this clearly:
The downfall of a government does not start at the ballot box.
It starts where the truth is silenced.

Power is temporary.
But the right cadre, the right mind and the right morality are permanent.

OTHER ARTICLES BY THE AUTHOR