We have been writing and drawing for months and we are writing again...
But there is nothing to be done to those who do not want to understand.
The one with bad eyesight blames the glasses for his blindness.
Even if he uses binoculars, he cannot see, because it is not a matter of sight, it is a surgical disease.
The grassroots on the right and the left are well herded by event-driven approaches.
The herd cheers as the rams clash.
The strange thing is that whichever one wins, it is he who goes away.
Nothing has changed.
A sheep is a sheep, whether on the right or on the left...
Karaman sheep and Romanov sheep are both sheep!
Those who get caught up in the heat of the moment and comment with the words “I'm burned” may see the truth when it cools down, but it is often too late.
Useful materials can never reach the truth.
And this is the most tragic part of it.
What is an Event, What is a Case?
What is the perception at the end of the event-centered approach?
What is the main problem with the case-centered approach?
Diagnosis and treatment without identifying the problem does not benefit either the doctor or the patient.
Indeed, the patient cannot leave the operating room.
Example:
In the last general election, the CHP received approximately party votes.
In the same election, Presidential candidate Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu received votes.
This table shows that:
Approximately votes came from outside the party.
So the right-wing voters...
“Halalization” and the “Halil İbrahim Table” strategy are at the heart of this success.
Main Question
Now the question is this:
Would Mesut Özarslan have resigned if Kılıçdaroğlu had become president?
Would this and similar crises have happened within the CHP?
Without asking these questions, the public cannot reach a healthy conclusion.
Because in event-centered approaches, the perpetrators are always brilliant.
Nobody says “my yogurt is black”.
Everyone is looking from their own window...
In terms of Özarslan:
“I'm the one who got the vote in Keçiören!”
In terms of specifics:
“He did too little, he deserved it!”
For Osman Gökçek:
“What a punch!”
In terms of others:
“Strong back!”, “Good for you!”
The list goes on and on...
Oil, pus and unprincipledness
Flattery, lubrication, and relations of interest continue unabated.
Unprincipled, unmeasured discourses are everywhere.
This is the visible face of a spineless state of mind.
And then there is the invisible behind-the-scenes diplomacy, who knows what goes on there...
“Persecution doesn't count when it's ours”
“If Pharaoh is from me, what he did is not oppression”,
“Our own bad is better than the best” mentality,
It is one of the most dangerous veins poisoning society.
Those who applauded the main opposition leader's street bouncer-like style,
we cannot ignore the calculations with which he is acting.
Plateau, Dog and Thief
On the plateau where the bone is the bone,
no dog barks at a thief.
Then the dog is cursed,
but the horseman leading the herd has long since disappeared.
Agha doesn't happen by shouting
An agha who takes the shepherd for a sucker is inevitably separated from his flock.
The shepherd who does what he sees from the Agha does not treat his dog as a man.
In the end, the dog doesn't take any of them seriously.
Agha is about giving, about taking hearts.
Not by shouting and calling.
The sincerity of those who say “my hennaed lamb” on the eve and hand it over to the butcher on the day of Eid is questioned.
It is wrong for those who cannot control their emotions to present a photo of a landlord.
Because:
Unchecked power is not power.