Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 154. maddesi Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131 adliye mahkemelerince verilen karar ve h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin son inceleme mercii olarak tan\u0131mlar. Yarg\u0131tay yaln\u0131zca bir temyiz makam\u0131 de\u011fildir; anayasal bir organd\u0131r. Kurulu\u015fu ve i\u015fleyi\u015fi kanunla d\u00fczenlenir. Bu nedenle Yarg\u0131tay\u2019dan beklenen yaln\u0131zca karar vermesi de\u011fil; hukuk devleti ilkesine uygun, denetlenebilir ve gerek\u00e7eli bi\u00e7imde hareket etmesidir.<\/p>\n
Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n ruhuna ve normlar\u0131na herkesten ve her \u015feyden \u00f6nce uymas\u0131 gereken organlar, bizatihi anayasal organlar\u0131n kendileri de\u011fil midir?<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2018\/3363 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda verilen karar sonras\u0131nda, dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine ve UYAP kay\u0131tlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin somut iddialar i\u00e7eren 28.05.2019 tarihli \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7em, Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 HSK Muhabere B\u00fcrosu arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na iletilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Bu ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k Kurulu\u2019nun 14.11.2019 tarihli ve 360 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f; \u201cYak\u0131nman\u0131n konusu yarg\u0131 yetkisinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan bir konuya ili\u015fkin ve iddialar soyut i\u00e7erikli oldu\u011fundan dosyan\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na\u2026\u201d<\/em><\/strong> h\u00fckmedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n Oysa; 2797 say\u0131l\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Kanunu\u2019nun 46. maddesi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Yarg\u0131tay \u00fcyeleri hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revle ilgili veya ki\u015fisel su\u00e7 iddialar\u0131nda Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k Kurulu, kendisine intikal eden ihbar ve \u015fik\u00e2yetleri inceleyerek soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir nitelikte g\u00f6r\u00fcrse bir ceza dairesi ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6revlendirir. Kanun \u201cinceleyerek\u201d karar verilmesini emretmektedir.<\/p>\n Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede \u015fu soru ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmazd\u0131r: \u015eik\u00e2yetim sonras\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekten bir inceleme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u0131d\u0131r?<\/p>\n Daha sonra, bilgi edinme talebimin reddi \u00fczerine Ankara 12. \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nde a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131m iptal davas\u0131nda, Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n mahkemeye g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi i\u015flem dosyas\u0131 incelendi\u011finde, karar\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 olarak tek sayfal\u0131k bir \u201cbilgi notu\u201d d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Bu bilgi notunda \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7emin somut i\u00e7eri\u011fine girilmemi\u015f, ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcm iddialar tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f; yaln\u0131zca dosyan\u0131n temyiz s\u00fcrecine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu ve \u015fik\u00e2yete konu ilamlar\u0131n kimler taraf\u0131ndan imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair y\u00fczeysel bir kay\u0131t yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Somut iddialar i\u00e7eren bir ba\u015fvurunun, i\u00e7eri\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmeden tek sayfal\u0131k bir notla sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, kanunun \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u201cinceleme\u201d y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcyle nas\u0131l ba\u011fda\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lacakt\u0131r? Burada dikkat \u00e7ekici bir kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rma vard\u0131r. \u0130dari personel hakk\u0131nda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131m \u015fik\u00e2yet \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay Y\u00f6netim Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan Tetkik H\u00e2kimi Emel Yurtsever Tosun g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015f, yaz\u0131\u015fmalar yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, m\u00fczekkereler d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f ve dosya \u00fczerinde i\u015flem y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi \u00fcyeleri hakk\u0131nda Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ceza dairesi ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6revlendirildi\u011fine dair dosyada herhangi bir kay\u0131t bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Benzer bir soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci g\u00f6r\u00fclmemektedir.<\/p>\n Daha \u00e7arp\u0131c\u0131 tablo ise Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019ndeki tazminat davas\u0131 dosyas\u0131na g\u00f6nderilen belgede ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Ger\u00e7ek ve t\u00fczel ki\u015filere ait toplam 32 ayr\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yet kalemi s\u0131ral\u0131 bi\u00e7imde yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; her biri i\u00e7in ayn\u0131 kal\u0131p gerek\u00e7e kullan\u0131larak i\u015fleme koymama karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n Listedeki 1 numaral\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yette \u201cyak\u0131nman\u0131n konusu yarg\u0131 yetkisinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan bir konuya ili\u015fkin ve iddialar soyut i\u00e7erikli oldu\u011fundan\u2026\u201d<\/em> <\/strong>denilmi\u015f; 9 numaral\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yette ayn\u0131 ifade tekrar edilmi\u015f; listenin sonundaki \u015fik\u00e2yet i\u00e7in de ayn\u0131 c\u00fcmle kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Gerek\u00e7e de\u011fi\u015fmemekte, i\u00e7erik tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmamakta ve inceleme ayr\u0131nt\u0131s\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu noktada mesele art\u0131k bireysel de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n 32 farkl\u0131 ba\u015fvurunun tek kal\u0131p gerek\u00e7eyle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 hukuk tekni\u011fi midir; yoksa y\u00fcksek yarg\u0131da kapal\u0131 devre bir refleksin tezah\u00fcr\u00fc m\u00fcd\u00fcr?<\/p>\n Kesinlik ilkesi hukuk g\u00fcvenli\u011fi i\u00e7in vard\u0131r. Ancak kesinlik, somut inceleme yap\u0131lmadan ve gerek\u00e7e somutla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmadan uygulan\u0131yorsa hukuk g\u00fcvenli\u011fi \u00fcretmez; hesap vermezlik \u00fcretir. Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019ne g\u00f6nderilen belge ise ger\u00e7ek ve t\u00fczel ki\u015filerin \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin listelendi\u011fini ve tek bir kal\u0131p ifadeyle i\u015fleme konulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koymu\u015ftur. Bu durum, etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131 ve hukuk devleti ilkesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ayr\u0131ca de\u011ferlendirilmesi gereken bir sorundur.<\/p>\n Bu arada, Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi, ilk derece mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve HMK\/46. madde h\u00fck\u00fcmleri do\u011frultusunda hakimin hukuki sorumlulu\u011funa dayal\u0131 olarak a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131m tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131 da reddetmi\u015f olup, Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n \u201ci\u015fleme koymama\u201d karar\u0131nda ve yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemlerde bir kusur g\u00f6rmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019ndan, hakimin hukuki sorumlulu\u011funa dair a\u00e7\u0131lan ve ilk derece mahkemesi s\u0131fat\u0131yla bak\u0131lan davalardaki kabul ve red oranlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda da yaz\u0131yla bilgi talep etmi\u015ftim. O talebimde red edildi ve reddedilmesi \u00fczerine Ankara 15.\u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nde a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131m iptal davas\u0131 da, Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n bu konuda bilgi vermek i\u00e7in yapaca\u011f\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n y\u0131llarca s\u00fcrebilece\u011finden bahisle red karar\u0131 verdi. Duyumlara ve kendi \u00e7abamla elde etti\u011fim bilgilere g\u00f6re ise bu \u015fekildeki tazminat davalar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131na yak\u0131n\u0131 red ediliyor.<\/p>\n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2. maddesi T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti\u2019ni hukuk devleti olarak tan\u0131mlar. Hukuk devleti; gerek\u00e7eli karar, \u015feffafl\u0131k ve denetlenebilirlik demektir.<\/p>\n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 154. maddesiyle kurulan Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n, bu ilkeleri herkesten \u00f6nce uygulamas\u0131 gerekmez mi?<\/p>\n Wenn die Mitglieder der Justiz nicht mehr rechenschaftspflichtig sind, bleibt die Rechtsstaatlichkeit auf dem Papier.<\/p>\n Y\u00fcksek yarg\u0131 kendisini etkili ve \u015feffaf bi\u00e7imde denetleyemiyorsa, yurtta\u015f hangi kap\u0131ya ba\u015fvuracakt\u0131r?<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Wenn die Mitglieder der Justiz nicht mehr rechenschaftspflichtig sind, bleibt die Rechtsstaatlichkeit auf dem Papier.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":282732,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[286],"tags":[289],"class_list":{"0":"post-282731","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-yazarlar","8":"tag-manset"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282731","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=282731"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282731\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":282733,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282731\/revisions\/282733"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/282732"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=282731"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=282731"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=282731"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nDaha sonra sundu\u011fum yeni dilek\u00e7eler ve ek deliller bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da ayn\u0131 yakla\u015f\u0131m s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f; \u201cdaha \u00f6nce karar verilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu\u201d gerek\u00e7esiyle yeniden karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
\nKarar\u0131n alt\u0131nda ise Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve kamuoyunda hukuku en iyi bilen, deneyimli y\u00fcksek yarg\u0131\u00e7lar olarak kabul edilen \u00fcyelerin imzalar\u0131 yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\nBilgi edinme taleplerim \u201ckurum i\u00e7i i\u015fleyi\u015f\u201d gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmi\u015f, a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131m iptal davas\u0131 ve istinaf ba\u015fvurusu da reddedilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6ylece inceleme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair \u015f\u00fcpheyi giderecek hi\u00e7bir resmi belge taraf\u0131ma verilmemi\u015f; ancak, mahkemeye g\u00f6nderilen i\u015flem dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011finden inceleme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n