{"id":281650,"date":"2026-01-18T15:03:19","date_gmt":"2026-01-18T15:03:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/?p=281650"},"modified":"2026-01-18T15:03:19","modified_gmt":"2026-01-18T15:03:19","slug":"chpde-hukuk-askida-mi-parti-darbe-altinda-mi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/chpde-hukuk-askida-mi-parti-darbe-altinda-mi\/","title":{"rendered":"Ist das Gesetz in der CHP au\u00dfer Kraft gesetzt oder befindet sich die Partei in einem Putsch?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi (CHP) hakk\u0131nda bug\u00fcn kamuoyunun \u00f6n\u00fcnde iki iddianame, iki mahkeme ve tek bir a\u011f\u0131r iddia vard\u0131r. Ankara 26.Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nde g\u00f6r\u00fclen \u201c\u015eaibeli Kurultay\u201d davas\u0131; \u0130stanbul 40. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nde kabul edilen ve kamuoyunda \u201cEkrem \u0130mamo\u011flu \u00c7\u0131kar Ama\u00e7l\u0131 Su\u00e7 \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\u201d olarak an\u0131lan iddianame\u2026 Bi\u00e7imsel olarak ayr\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcyen bu dosyalar, i\u00e7erik bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 zemine i\u015faret etmektedir: CHP\u2019nin iradesinin sistematik bi\u00e7imde ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi iddias\u0131.<\/p>\n

Bu nedenle mesele, birka\u00e7 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131 de\u011fildir. Mesele, bir siyasi partinin iradesine i\u00e7eriden m\u00fcdahale edilip edilmedi\u011fi, hatta daha ileri bir ihtimal olarak partiye bir darbe yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

\u0130ki \u0130ddianame, Tek Zemin \u2013 Birle\u015ftirme Neden G\u00fcndemde?<\/h3>\n

Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n iddianamesi, kurultay s\u00fcrecinde delegelerin iradesinin fesada u\u011frat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131; \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n iddianamesi ise belediyeler \u00fczerinden kuruldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen \u00f6rg\u00fctsel ve mali mekanizman\u0131n, parti i\u00e7i iktidar\u0131 kontrol etmeye y\u00f6neldi\u011fini anlat\u0131r. Su\u00e7 tipleri farkl\u0131 olabilir; fakat, iddia ayn\u0131d\u0131r: parti iradesinin gasp\u0131.<\/p>\n

Bu nedenle Ankara 26.Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin \u0130stanbul 40. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019ne yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 birle\u015ftirme talepli m\u00fczekkere, teknik bir ayr\u0131nt\u0131 de\u011fil; maddi hakikatin tek dosyada aranmas\u0131 gere\u011finin kabul\u00fcd\u00fcr. Par\u00e7al\u0131 dosyalarla b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fckl\u00fc ger\u00e7e\u011fe ula\u015f\u0131lamaz.<\/p>\n

Ma\u011fdur Kim? Kat\u0131lan Kim?<\/h3>\n

Ankara 26.Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin dosyas\u0131nda ma\u011fdur olarak, CHP\u2019nin 13 y\u0131l genel ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yapm\u0131\u015f olan Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu g\u00f6sterilmektedir. Bu, iddianamenin \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klar: Kurultay iradesi sakatlanm\u0131\u015fsa, zarar g\u00f6ren yaln\u0131z bireyler de\u011fil, CHP\u2019nin t\u00fczel ki\u015fili\u011fidir.<\/p>\n

Ne var ki dosyada CHP ad\u0131na bir kat\u0131lma talebi yoktur. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k \u00f6nceki d\u00f6nem CHP\u2019nin Hatay B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i L\u00fctf\u00fc Sava\u015f kat\u0131lan olarak kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Daha da \u00e7arp\u0131c\u0131s\u0131, CHP y\u00f6neticileri ve milletvekillerinin san\u0131klar\u0131n duru\u015fmas\u0131na moral ve destek vermek \u00fczere kat\u0131lmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Burada ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz soru \u015fudur: CHP ma\u011fdur mu, yoksa taraf m\u0131d\u0131r?<\/p>\n

En Sert Tezat: CHP\u2019nin Kurumsal Avukat\u0131 Kimin Avukat\u0131d\u0131r?<\/h3>\n

Dosyan\u0131n en sars\u0131c\u0131 \u00e7eli\u015fkisi burada belirir. CHP\u2019nin kurumsal avukat\u0131, ayn\u0131 zamanda \u0130ddianamelerde \u201c\u00c7\u0131kar Ama\u00e7l\u0131 Su\u00e7 \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\u201dn\u00fcn ve CHP\u2019yi ele ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi iddia olunan organizasyonun lideri oldu\u011fu iddia olunan Ekrem \u0130mamo\u011flu\u2019nun savunmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00fcstlenmektedir.<\/p>\n

Bir partinin kurumsal avukat\u0131, o partinin hak ve hukukunu korumakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Oysa iddianameler, CHP\u2019nin iradesinin \u0130mamo\u011flu organizasyonu olarak an\u0131lan bir yap\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrmektedir. E\u011fer bu iddia do\u011fruysa, CHP\u2019nin avukat\u0131 ma\u011fdurun yan\u0131nda durmal\u0131d\u0131r. E\u011fer do\u011fru de\u011filse, CHP\u2019nin neden bu dosyada ma\u011fdur s\u0131fat\u0131 almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Ayn\u0131 anda ikisi birden olamaz. Ama bug\u00fcn gelinen noktada, CHP\u2019nin avukat\u0131 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yan\u0131ndad\u0131r, CHP ise suskundur. Bu, basit bir vek\u00e2let tercihi de\u011fil, kurumsal bir temsil krizidir.<\/p>\n

Savunmalar\u0131n Ortak Dili: \u0130nk\u00e2r ve Normalle\u015ftirme<\/h3>\n

Ankara 26.Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin 13 Ocak 2026 tarihinde g\u00f6r\u00fclen ikinci duru\u015fmas\u0131nda san\u0131klar\u0131n ve avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n savunmalar\u0131n\u0131n ortak bir hatta birle\u015fti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir: \u201cSu\u00e7 anla\u015f\u0131lam\u0131yor\u201d, tan\u0131klara y\u00f6nelik \u201ciftirac\u0131\/m\u00fcfteri\u201d ithamlar\u0131, somut delillere temas etmeyen beyanlar ve dosyan\u0131n \u201csiyasal\u201d oldu\u011fu vurgusu. Hatta bir m\u00fcdafi, \u201csiyasetin ekip i\u015fi oldu\u011funu\u201d ve benzer durumlar\u0131n ba\u015fka partilerde de ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.
\nBu, hukuk de\u011fildir. Bu, normalle\u015ftirmedir. Ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda \u201cba\u015fkalar\u0131 da yap\u0131yor\u201d savunmas\u0131, hukuki gerek\u00e7e de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n

298 mi, 2820 mi? Tart\u0131\u015fman\u0131n \u00d6z\u00fcn\u00fc Ka\u00e7\u0131rmamak<\/h3>\n

San\u0131klar ve avukatlar\u0131, 298 say\u0131l\u0131 Se\u00e7imlerin Temel H\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve Se\u00e7men K\u00fct\u00fckleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019a dayanarak 6 ayl\u0131k zaman a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 iddias\u0131nda bulunmu\u015f; Mahkeme ise davan\u0131n 2820 say\u0131l\u0131 Siyasi Partiler Kanunu kapsam\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve su\u00e7 vasf\u0131n\u0131n dosya sonunda de\u011ferlendirilece\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Teknik tart\u0131\u015fman\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fc \u015fudur: Bu, basit bir se\u00e7im ihlali mi; yoksa \u00f6rg\u00fctl\u00fc bi\u00e7imde parti iradesinin y\u00f6nlendirilmesi midir?<\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul 40.A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin dosyas\u0131, ikinci ihtimali i\u015faret etmektedir. E\u011fer, dosya birle\u015ftirilirse, su\u00e7un kapsam\u0131 ve san\u0131klar i\u00e7in istenilen cezalar\u0131n de\u011fi\u015fmesi muhtemeldir.<\/p>\n

Neden Tutuklu, Ne ile \u0130tham Ediliyor?<\/h3>\n

CHP y\u00f6netimi taraf\u0131ndan \u201cCumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 aday\u0131\u201d olarak sunulan Ekrem \u0130mamo\u011flu, \u0130stanbul 40.A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019ndeki dosyada; \u00e7\u0131kar ama\u00e7l\u0131 su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc kurmak ve y\u00f6netmek, irtikap, r\u00fc\u015fvet, ihaleye fesat, ki\u015fisel verilerin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 kayd\u0131 gibi a\u011f\u0131r su\u00e7lamalarla tutukludur. \u0130ddianame, bu yap\u0131n\u0131n yaln\u0131zca maddi kazan\u00e7 i\u00e7in de\u011fil, CHP\u2019nin ele ge\u00e7irilmesi amac\u0131yla kuruldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrmektedir.<\/p>\n

Bu iddia seti kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda bir siyasi partinin disiplin i\u015fletmemesi, ma\u011fdur s\u0131fat\u0131 almamas\u0131 ve san\u0131klara a\u00e7\u0131k destek vermesi, hukuken de siyaseten de izah edilemez.<\/p>\n

\u201c\u0130ki Do\u011fru Olmaz\u201d: Hukuksal Zorunluluk ve Tedbir Meselesi<\/h3>\n

Meselenin d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcm noktas\u0131 \u015fudur: Bu noktada s\u00f6z konusu olan, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n sonucunu beklemek de\u011fil; parti hukukundan ve kamu d\u00fczeninden do\u011fan koruyucu\u2013\u00f6nleyici tedbir y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

E\u011fer iddianamelerde anlat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi CHP ele ge\u00e7irilmi\u015fse, parti organlar\u0131nda g\u00f6rev alm\u0131\u015f olanlar\u0131n en az\u0131ndan tedbiren g\u00f6revden el \u00e7ektirilmesi, yetkilerinin ask\u0131ya al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve disiplin s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinin derhal ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131, bir \u201ctercih\u201d de\u011fil; kurumsal me\u015fruiyetin asgari \u015fart\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Aksi halde; yani, hi\u00e7bir tedbir i\u015fletilmezken san\u0131klara kurumsal destek s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcrken, iddianame anlat\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekli\u011fi konusunda kamu vicdan\u0131nda teredd\u00fct do\u011fmas\u0131 ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmazd\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Bu, teorik bir tart\u0131\u015fma de\u011fildir. Nitekim \u0130stanbul 45. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi, CHP \u0130stanbul \u0130l Y\u00f6netimi hakk\u0131nda \u201c\u015faibeli bi\u00e7imde ele ge\u00e7irilme\u201d iddias\u0131yla ceza davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine, ihtiyati tedbir karar\u0131 vererek mevcut y\u00f6netimi g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130stanbul 45. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi, \u201csonucu bekleyelim\u201d dememi\u015f; kurumsal risk kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda tedbir yolunu se\u00e7mi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Ankara 42.Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nde ise Ankara 26. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin kabul etti\u011fi iddianamede \u00e7ok daha a\u011f\u0131r ithamlar ve somut deliller bulunmas\u0131na ve bu dosya delil olarak g\u00f6sterilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, Mahkeme, \u201ctedbir\u201d karar\u0131 vermek bir tarafa, duru\u015fma tarihleri ile s\u00fcreci uzatm\u0131\u015f, Parti\u2019yi su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ad\u0131na ele ge\u00e7irdikleri iddia olunan Parti y\u00f6netiminin, adeta kanuna kar\u015f\u0131 hile yoluna ba\u015fvurarak 22. Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc ve 39. Ola\u011fan Kurultay\u2019\u0131 yapmas\u0131na olanak tan\u0131m\u0131\u015f ve akabinde de, davan\u0131n konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle reddine karar verebilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 taraf istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015f ve bu arada \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n iddianamesi ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f ve \u0130stanbul 40. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nde ceza davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul 45.Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019ndeki ilke, Ankara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nde i\u015fletilmemi\u015f ve tezatl\u0131k giderilememi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Sonu\u00e7: Tezat Giderilmelidir \u2013 Ba\u015fka Yol Yoktur<\/h3>\n

Bug\u00fcn gelinen noktada tablo a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r: CHP\u2019nin mevcut y\u00f6netimi, san\u0131klar\u0131n yan\u0131nda durmakta ve fiilen sorumlulu\u011fu \u00fcstlenmektedir. Bu tutum, a\u00e7\u0131k bir sahiplenme anlam\u0131na gelmektedir.
\n\u0130\u015fte tam da bu nedenle, ortadaki tezatl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ertelenmeden giderilmesi hukuki bir zorunluluktur. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc iki ihtimal vard\u0131r ve ayn\u0131 anda ikisi birden do\u011fru olamaz:
\nE\u011fer iddianamelerde anlat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi CHP ele ge\u00e7irilmi\u015fse, parti organlar\u0131nda g\u00f6rev alm\u0131\u015f olanlar\u0131n derhal g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, yetkilerinin ask\u0131ya al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve disiplin s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinin i\u015fletilmesi hukuken ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmazd\u0131r. Aksi h\u00e2lde \u201cele ge\u00e7irilme\u201d iddias\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015f; ama, bu kabul\u00fcn hukuken gere\u011fi yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olur ki bu, hukukta ve siyasette m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n

E\u011fer CHP y\u00f6netimi san\u0131klar\u0131n yan\u0131nda duruyor, onlar\u0131 savunuyor ve sorumlulu\u011fu \u00fcstleniyorsa, bu durumda iddianamelerde yer alan \u201cpartinin ele ge\u00e7irilmesi\u201d anlat\u0131s\u0131 Parti y\u00f6neticilerinin pratikleriyle de do\u011frulanm\u0131\u015f olur. Bu durumda, Parti\u2019nin kurumsal iradesinin kalmam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funa i\u015faret eder.<\/p>\n

Bir siyasi parti, kendi t\u00fczel ki\u015fili\u011fine y\u00f6nelik organize bir yap\u0131 eliyle \u201cele ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f\u201d oldu\u011funu iddia eden dosyalar\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 halinde, derhal bu organize yap\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131 Parti T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019nden kaynaklanan yetkilerini kullanarak ar\u0131nd\u0131rma i\u015flemlerine ba\u015flamak suretiyle operasyonu bo\u015fa d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcr, \u00f6te yandan ise adli merciiler nezdinde m\u00fcsellah kararl\u0131l\u0131kla organize yap\u0131 mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in hukuki m\u00fccadelesini s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcr.
\nCHP y\u00f6netimi ise tam aksini yapmakta ve iddianamelerde yer alan \u201cParti\u2019nin ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi\u201d iddialar\u0131n\u0131 kuvvetlendirici s\u00f6ylem ve pratikler i\u00e7erisinde bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Bu durum, hukukta da siyasette de s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclemez bir \u00e7eli\u015fkidir.<\/p>\n

Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, mesele art\u0131k yaln\u0131zca yarg\u0131n\u0131n verece\u011fi karar de\u011fildir. Mesele, bu tezatl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilip giderilmeyece\u011fidir. Giderilmedi\u011fi her g\u00fcn, hukukun yerini belirsizlik; siyasetin yerini ise me\u015fruiyet krizi almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ankara 26.Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin \u0130stanbul 40. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019ne yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 birle\u015ftirme talepli m\u00fczekkere, teknik bir ayr\u0131nt\u0131 de\u011fil; maddi hakikatin tek dosyada aranmas\u0131 gere\u011finin kabul\u00fcd\u00fcr.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":281652,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[286],"tags":[15,291,289],"class_list":{"0":"post-281650","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-yazarlar","8":"tag-chp","9":"tag-ekrem-imamoglu","10":"tag-manset"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281650","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=281650"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281650\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":281653,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281650\/revisions\/281653"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/281652"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=281650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=281650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/halkweb.com.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=281650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}